In-Scope Vulnerabilities Web
We are interested in the following vulnerabilities:
- Business logic issues
- Payments manipulation
- Remote code execution (RCE)
- Database vulnerability, SQLi
- File inclusions (Local & Remote)
- Access Control Issues (IDOR, Privilege Escalation, etc)
- Leakage of sensitive information
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Other vulnerability with a clear potential loss
In-Scope Vulnerabilities Smart Contracts
The list is not limited to the following submissions but it gives an overview of what issues we care about:
- Stealing or loss of funds
- Unauthorized transaction
- Transaction manipulation
- Price manipulation
- Fee payment bypass
- Balance manipulation
- Privacy violation
- Cryptographic flaws
- Reentrancy
- Logic errors
- Including user authentication errors
- Solidity/EVM details not considered
- Including integer over-/under-flow
- Including rounding errors
- Including unhandled exceptions
- Trusting trust/dependency vulnerabilities
- Including composability vulnerabilities
- Oracle failure/manipulation
- Novel governance attacks
- Economic/financial attacks
- Including flash loan attacks
- Congestion and scalability
- Including running out of gas
- Including block stuffing
- Including susceptibility to frontrunning
- Consensus failures
- Cryptography problems
- Signature malleability
- Susceptibility to replay attacks
- Weak randomness
- Weak encryption
- Susceptibility to block timestamp manipulation
- Missing access controls / unprotected internal or debugging interfaces
Out-of-Scope Vulnerabilities Web
Vulnerabilities found in out of scope resources are unlikely to be rewarded unless they present a serious business risk (at our sole discretion). In general, the following vulnerabilities do not correspond to the severity threshold:
- Vulnerabilities in third-party applications
- Best practices concerns
- Recently (less than 30 days) disclosed 0day vulnerabilities
- Vulnerabilities affecting users of outdated browsers or platforms
- Social engineering, phishing, physical, or other fraud activities
- Publicly accessible login panels without proof of exploitation
- Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof of concept
- Vulnerabilities involving active content such as web browser add-ons
- Most brute-forcing issues without clear impact
- Denial of service
- Theoretical issues
- Moderately Sensitive Information Disclosure
- Spam (sms, email, etc)
- Missing HTTP security headers
- Infrastructure vulnerabilities, including:
- Certificates/TLS/SSL related issues
- DNS issues (i.e. MX records, SPF records, DMARC records, etc.)
- Server configuration issues (i.e., open ports, TLS, etc.)
- Open redirects
- Session fixation
- User account enumeration
- Clickjacking/Tapjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking/tap jacking
- Descriptive error messages (e.g. Stack Traces, application or server errors)
- Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
- Login & Logout CSRF
- Weak Captcha/Captcha Bypass
- Lack of Secure and HTTPOnly cookie flags
- Username/email enumeration via Login/Forgot Password Page error messages
- CSRF in forms that are available to anonymous users (e.g. the contact form)
- OPTIONS/TRACE HTTP method enabled
- Host header issues without proof-of-concept demonstrating the vulnerability
- Content spoofing and text injection issues without showing an attack vector/without being able to modify HTML/CSS
- Content Spoofing without embedded links/HTML
- Reflected File Download (RFD)
- Mixed HTTP Content
- HTTPS Mixed Content Scripts
- DoS/DDoS issues
- Manipulation with Password Reset Token
- MitM and local attacks
Out-of-Scope Vulnerabilities Smart Contracts
- Attacks that the reporter has already exploited themselves, leading to damage
- Attacks requiring access to leaked keys/credentials
- Attacks requiring access to privileged addresses (governance, strategist)
- Incorrect data supplied by third party oracles
- Not to exclude oracle manipulation/flash loan attacks
- Basic economic governance attacks (e.g. 51% attack)
- Lack of liquidity
- Best practice critiques
- Sybil attacks