All out-of-scope will be marked as spam , deducting 20 points. Unless the report feels like it was mined by heart rather than a scanner-generated report. If too many points have been deducted, you can submit a report that meets the scope, and we will make up all the previous points.
Extreme: Up to $100,000
- Vulnerabilities that affect critical assets that could cause serious business disruption such as: Unauthorized access to HTX owned hot/cold wallet assets,funds, and/or wallet private keys.
Universal Reward
- Reflected XSS (including DOM XSS) at *.htx.com $500
- Store XSS at *.htx.com $1,500
- Subdomain Hijacking (zendesk) $500
- Subdomain Hijacking (complete) on *.HTX.com $3,000
- Inflated assets (complete) $8,000
- Inflated assets (General system account balance theft) $6,000
IN-SCOPE VULNERABILITIES
We are interested in the following vulnerabilities:
- Business logic issues
- Payments manipulation
- Remote code execution (RCE)
- Database vulnerability, SQLi
- File inclusions (Local & Remote)
- Access Control Issues (IDOR, Privilege Escalation, etc)
- Leakage of sensitive information
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Other vulnerability with a clear potential loss
OUT-OF-SCOPE VULNERABILITIES
OUT OF SCOPE - WEB
Vulnerabilities found in out of scope resources are unlikely to be rewarded unless they present a serious business risk (at our sole discretion). In general, the following vulnerabilities do not correspond to the severity threshold:
- Vulnerabilities in third-party applications
- Assets that do not belong to HTX
- Best practices concerns
- Recently (less than 30 days) disclosed 0day vulnerabilities
- Vulnerabilities affecting users of outdated browsers or platforms
- Social engineering, phishing, physical, or other fraud activities
- Publicly accessible login panels without proof of exploitation
- Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof of concept
- Vulnerabilities involving active content such as web browser add-ons
- Most brute-forcing issues without clear impact
- Denial of service
- Theoretical issues
- Moderately Sensitive Information Disclosure
- Spam (sms, email, etc)
- Missing HTTP security headers
- Infrastructure vulnerabilities, including:
Certificates/TLS/SSL related issues;
DNS issues (i.e. MX records, SPF records, DMARC records, etc.);
Server configuration issues (i.e., open ports, TLS, etc.)
- Open redirects
- Session fixation
- User account enumeration
- Clickjacking/Tapjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking/tap jacking
- Descriptive error messages (e.g. Stack Traces, application or server errors)
- Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
- Login & Logout CSRF
- Weak Captcha/Captcha Bypass
- Lack of Secure and HTTPOnly cookie flags
- Username/email enumeration via Login/Forgot Password Page error messages
- CSRF in forms that are available to anonymous users (e.g. the contact form)
- OPTIONS/TRACE HTTP method enabled
- Host header issues without proof-of-concept demonstrating the vulnerability
- Content spoofing and text injection issues without showing an attack vector/without being able to modify HTML/CSS
- Content Spoofing without embedded links/HTML
- Reflected File Download (RFD)
- Mixed HTTP Content
- HTTPS Mixed Content Scripts
- DoS/DDoS issues
- Manipulation with Password Reset Token
- MitM and local attacks
OUT OF SCOPE - MOBILE
- Attacks requiring physical access to a user's device
- Vulnerabilities that require root/jailbreak
- Vulnerabilities requiring extensive user interaction
- Exposure of non-sensitive data on the device
- Reports from static analysis of the binary without PoC that impacts business logic
- Lack of obfuscation/binary protection/root(jailbreak) detection
- Bypass certificate pinning on rooted devices
- Lack of Exploit mitigations i.e., PIE, ARC, or Stack Canaries
- Sensitive data in URLs/request bodies when protected by TLS
- Path disclosure in the binary
- OAuth & app secret hard-coded/recoverable in IPA, APK
- Sensitive information retained as plaintext in the device’s memory
- Crashes due to malformed URL Schemes or Intents sent to exported Activity/Service/Broadcast Receiver (exploiting these for sensitive data leakage is commonly in scope)
- Any kind of sensitive data stored in-app private directory
- Runtime hacking exploits using tools like but not limited to Frida/ Appmon (exploits only possible in a jailbroken environment)
- Shared links leaked through the system clipboard
- Any URIs leaked because a malicious app has permission to view URIs opened.
- Exposure of API keys with no security impact (Google Maps API keys etc.)
- Regarding the leakage of github information, we have internal monitoring measures to monitor the leakage of github information, but most of them are the behavior of resigned employees, and there will be some time for communication, so we will have a three-day disposal period. If you find the leakage of github information, the time More than three days, then we might accept it. But if only some insignificant test environment information leaks, then the report will be ignored.